Users get 3 votes to give out per competition.
Success Message
Failuer Message
Global Conflict
Architects
About the Pitch
Kansas City Metro
Missouri
United States
City:
State:
Country:
School or Organization:
Competition Brief
About Us
The Architects: Global Conflict: Allan D, Grant E
Problem
Our subject matter expert, Mark Adams, the educational director of Truman Library, challenged us to determine whether or not increasing global awareness leads to an increase in global conflict.
Solution
We researched the United States' role in causing the current Ukranian war and we are creating a website that compares and contrasts our relations with Russia since WWI. We are also making a series of maps that will show the Russian boundaries and how over time, they went from allies to enemies.
Target Market
Societal Impact
Our audience will learn about the relationship between Russia and the US over the years.
Next Steps
We still need to complete the website.
Our Schools and Districts
We've worked really well together. WE've been challenged with only having two people on our team and we've challenged ourselves to do more work.
Use of Backer Contributions
We only ask that people attend our showcase on June 29 from 9:30-10:30 and 12:00-1:00. Business partners interested in working with our students on future projects, please contact our Director of Community Partnerships, Jake Wingo, at jake.wingo@raypec.org.
Thank you to our supporters!
Comments
(* Comments)
New Comment
Thanks for your submission. Your comment is awaiting approval from the educator
No Comments Found
Want to comment or judge pitches? Partner today!
Judge Access:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria One:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria Two:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria Three:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria Four:
1- Did not do
2- Little evidence
3- Some requirements met
4- Most requirements met
5- All requirements met
Criteria Five:
Total Rating:
1
Thanks for contributing to the growth of young innovators!